NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1185 MHz
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 11748
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 483
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 78123
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 168.08
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 1935.102
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 22.794
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 111.023
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1001.496
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 17328
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 17328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3359
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3359
• 977.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6841 vs 7

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18252 11748
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	885 483
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	99847 78123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.508 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045.784 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.145 22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	158.103 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1438.826 1001.496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25232 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 8055
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7 6841

Compare specifications (specs)