NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 81% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18254 versus 11744
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 versus 483
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99973 versus 78224
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 168.08
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 1935.102
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 22.794
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 111.023
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1001.496
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 17328
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 17328
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 29 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 885 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 versus 11744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 versus 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99973 versus 78224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1001.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 17328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 215 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3359
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3359
- 976.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6835 versus 7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 215 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6835 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 | 11744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99973 | 78224 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1001.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8055 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 6835 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 178 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | None |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
