NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 17881
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 72551
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 256.103
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 2513.321
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 19.708
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 43.083
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1139.382
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3686
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 6 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 vs 17881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 vs 72551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 879
- 338.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2372 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 879 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 vs 7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 | 17881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 934 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 | 72551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 2372 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 129 | 225 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,200 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3840 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
