NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 23% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 versus 17881
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 versus 72551
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 256.103
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 2513.321
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 19.708
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 43.083
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1139.382
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3686
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3686
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 6 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 versus 17881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 versus 72551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2560
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 versus 879
- 338.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2372 versus 7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2560 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 versus 879 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 | 17881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 934 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 | 72551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 2372 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 6 April 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 129 | 225 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,200 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3840 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
