NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2944 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 70535
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 6316
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 6966
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 6293
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 6966
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 6293
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 6293 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18814 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 27566 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Place in performance rating | 98 | 165 |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
NVIDIAA30
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
