NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.65 GTexel/s versus 213.9 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 50648 versus 39571
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 12.895
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 13738
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3356
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 13738
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 21 March 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s versus 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50648 versus 39571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 12.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 988 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1114 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2048
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6612 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11770 versus 6921
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 versus 405
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 versus 165.993
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 versus 1980.866
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 versus 135.641
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 768.171 versus 745.481
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 988 MHz versus 712 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1114 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 2048 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6612 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11770 versus 6921 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 versus 405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 versus 165.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 versus 1980.866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 versus 135.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 versus 745.481 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6921 | 11770 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50648 | 39571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 207.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 2593.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 12.895 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 145.003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 768.171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 415 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA107 | GM200 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 21 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 249 | 248 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $2,825 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 8,000 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
