NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6831 vs 6494
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 32981
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 87.83
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 9009
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3359
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 9009
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6831 6494
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 404
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50663 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3359

Compare specifications (specs)