NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 4809
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 22421
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 8870
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3586
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 8870
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3586
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 May 2021 vs 14 November 2018
Core clock speed 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 vs 4809
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 vs 22421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 vs 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 vs 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3586

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 497
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1190 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 585 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10117
4809
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
497
585
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57885
22421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 4809
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 585
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 22421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 469

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Essentials

Architecture Ampere GCN 5.0
Code name GA106 Vega 12
Launch date 11 May 2021 14 November 2018
Place in performance rating 276 367
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1035 MHz 1190 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 49.68 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 12000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR6