NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 4809
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 22421
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 8870
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3586
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 8870
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3586
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 4809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3586 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 497
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 4809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 585 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 22421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 14 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 367 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |