NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 6967
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 36107
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 105.688
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 1083.926
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 8.251
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 79.029
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 520.089
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 9172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3624
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 9172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3624
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 6967 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 vs 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 vs 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 vs 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 vs 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 497
- Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 vs 469
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 497 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 vs 469 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 405 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |