NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 versus 6967
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 versus 36107
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 105.688
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 versus 1083.926
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 versus 8.251
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 79.029
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 versus 520.089
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3624
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3624
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 versus 6967 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 versus 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 versus 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 versus 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926-1168 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 92% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 497
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 versus 469
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 497 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 6967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 79.029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 405 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
