NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 409.9x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57384 vs 44939
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 200.776 vs 150.951
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1938.08 vs 1718.593
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.298 vs 12.283
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 108.443 vs 28.289
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 10 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57384 vs 44939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 200.776 vs 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1938.08 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.298 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 108.443 vs 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- 2x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13510 vs 10166
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 vs 497
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 568.183
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6065 vs 5391
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13510 vs 10166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 vs 497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 vs 568.183 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6065 vs 5391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10166 | 13510 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57384 | 44939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 200.776 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1938.08 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.298 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 108.443 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5391 | 6065 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 10 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 269 | 279 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |