NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 187.131
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 15.882
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 117.673

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 10117
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 497
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 57885
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 2082.931
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 599.217
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 16098
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 16098
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 vs 469

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10117 12712
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 804
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57885 62641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.393 187.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2082.931 2548.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.561 15.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.68 117.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	599.217 901.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 1278

Compare specifications (specs)