NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 950 MHz
• 2723.7x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 30.4 billion / sec
• 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 1445
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 269
• 14.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 4062
• 21.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 10.837
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 405.086
• 15.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 1.098
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 21.798
• 17.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 33.754
• 14.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 1094
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3176
• 14.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 1094
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3176

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 475 vs 469

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10117 1445
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 269
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57885 4062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.393 10.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2082.931 405.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.561 1.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.68 21.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	599.217 33.754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3176
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 475

Compare specifications (specs)