NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1035 MHz versus 950 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 82.80 GTexel/s versus 30.4 billion / sec
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 versus 1445
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 versus 269
- 14.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 versus 4062
- 21.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 10.837
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 versus 405.086
- 15.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 versus 1.098
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 21.798
- 17.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 versus 33.754
- 14.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 1094
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2253
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3176
- 14.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 1094
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2253
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3176
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s versus 30.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 versus 1445 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 versus 269 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 versus 4062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 10.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 versus 405.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 1.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 versus 33.754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3176 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 835 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 475 versus 469
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 835 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 1445 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 269 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 4062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 10.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 405.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 1.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 33.754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3176 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 475 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Nom de code | GA106 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 1253 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 835 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 30.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 1,270 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |