NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 499.4x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57390 vs 42289
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 200.776 vs 152.325
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1938.08 vs 1590.392
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.298 vs 11.365
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 108.443 vs 45.977
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 15267
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 15267
• Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5393 vs 4904

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.1x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11654 vs 10167
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 497
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 568.183

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10167 11654
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 827
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57390 42289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	200.776 152.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1938.08 1590.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.298 11.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	108.443 45.977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.183 751.626
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5393 4904

Compare specifications (specs)