NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 6494
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 404
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 32981
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 87.83
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 9009
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 9009
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 6494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 9009 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 6494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 32981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 87.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU117 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 400 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |