NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 6494
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 404
  • Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 32981
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 87.83
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 9009
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 9009
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 May 2021 vs 27 May 2019
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2560 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 vs 6494
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 vs 404
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 vs 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393 vs 87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 vs 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 vs 9009

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10117
6494
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
497
404
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
57885
32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
229.393
87.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16098
9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA Quadro T1000
PassMark - G3D Mark 10117 6494
PassMark - G2D Mark 497 404
Geekbench - OpenCL 57885 32981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 229.393 87.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2082.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16098 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16098 9009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 469

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA Quadro T1000

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA106 TU117
Launch date 11 May 2021 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 276 400
Type Laptop Mobile Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1035 MHz 1455 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.299 TFLOPS 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 768
Pixel fill rate 49.68 GPixel/s 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 82.80 GTexel/s 69.84 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 12000 million 4700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 128 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 8000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5