NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22408 vs 18252
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 885
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 124865 vs 99847
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 vs 293.508
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 4045.784
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.794 vs 29.145
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 vs 158.103
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1634.218 vs 1438.826
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 25232
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3718
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3359
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 25232
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3718
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3359
• 1944.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13611 vs 7

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 220 Watt
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22408 18252
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 885
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	124865 99847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	452.561 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5803.174 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.794 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.548 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1634.218 1438.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	13611 7

Compare specifications (specs)