NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22409 versus 18255
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 886
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 122978 versus 99973
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 293.508
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 4045.784
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 29.145
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 158.103
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1438.826
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 25232
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3718
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3359
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 25232
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3718
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3359
- 1945.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13616 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 2560 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22409 versus 18255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122978 versus 99973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13616 versus 7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 220 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22409 | 18255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122978 | 99973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13616 | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 41 | 134 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |