NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 19514
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 920
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 115804
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 338.122
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 4571.03
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 31.6
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1653.08
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 27179
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3355
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 27179
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3716
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3355
- 1581.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 vs 182.055
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 vs 182.055 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 190.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 44 | 110 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |