NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and AMD FirePro S10000 Passive videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 264x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 2.9x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 3584 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 750 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD FirePro S10000 Passive |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | AMD FirePro S10000 Passive | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GA102 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 12 November 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $3,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10496 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 305 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | Triple-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 480 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
