NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1075 MHz
2895.8x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
3.4x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3072
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
174.1x more memory clock speed: 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 12748
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 828
4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 41155
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 157.231
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 1722.566
5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 12.245
5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 38.225
4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 518.554
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 9834
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 9834
4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 1231

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Sep 2020 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Texture fill rate	556.0 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
Pipelines	10496 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 12 GB
Memory clock speed	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	26668 vs 12748
PassMark - G2D Mark	1060 vs 828
Geekbench - OpenCL	191142 vs 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	690.619 vs 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258 vs 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	62.614 vs 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	209.424 vs 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384 vs 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5118 vs 1231

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt vs 350 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

26668

12748

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1060

828

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

191142

41155

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

690.619

157.231

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7585.258

1722.566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

62.614

12.245

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

209.424

38.225

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2441.384

518.554

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3343

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

5118

1231

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark	26668	12748
PassMark - G2D Mark	1060	828
Geekbench - OpenCL	191142	41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	690.619	157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258	1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	62.614	12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	209.424	38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384	518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5118	1231

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GA102	GM200
Launch date	1 Sep 2020	17 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$1499	$999
Place in performance rating	46	332
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$1,999.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	10496	3072
Pixel fill rate	189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	556.0 GTexel/s	192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	350 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	28300 million	8,000 million
CUDA cores		3072
Floating-point performance		6,691 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	138 mm (5.4 inches)	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	313 mm (12.3 inches)	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	750 Watt	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Width	Triple-slot
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	936.2 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost