NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 1949.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 11919
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 717
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 40028
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 13107
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 13107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 11919 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 717 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 40028 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 13107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 5.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 11919 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 717 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 40028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA102 | GM200 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 244 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |