NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • 1949.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.4x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3072
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 11919
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 717
  • 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 40028
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 13107
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 13107
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 vs 5 March 2016
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1695 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 10496 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 26668 vs 11919
PassMark - G2D Mark 1060 vs 717
Geekbench - OpenCL 191142 vs 40028
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398 vs 13107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • 5.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3713

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
26668
11919
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1060
717
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
191142
40028
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33398
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33398
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3354
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 26668 11919
PassMark - G2D Mark 1060 717
Geekbench - OpenCL 191142 40028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 690.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 209.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5118

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Maxwell 2.0
Code name GA102 GM200
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 5 March 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $1499 $4,999
Place in performance rating 46 244
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines 10496 3072
Pixel fill rate 189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s 285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 350 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 28300 million 8,000 million
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 313 mm (12.3 inches) 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin 1x 8-pin
Width Triple-slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 936.2 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR5