NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 15966
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 736
• Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 105171
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 226.447
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 4161.764
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 25.476
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 118.544
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1106.12
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 19811
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 19811
• Around 87% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 10685

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26747 15966
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1050 736
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191350 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.011 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19948 10685

Compare specifications (specs)