NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

versus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 versus 15966
Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 versus 736
Environ 82% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 versus 105171
3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 226.447
Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 4161.764
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 25.476
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 118.544
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1106.12
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 19811
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 19811
Environ 87% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 versus 10685

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020 versus 13 August 2018
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 12 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	26747 versus 15966
PassMark - G2D Mark	1050 versus 736
Geekbench - OpenCL	191350 versus 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	732.196 versus 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258 versus 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.011 versus 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.569 versus 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384 versus 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 versus 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 versus 19811
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19948 versus 10685

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1695 MHz
Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 350 Watt
11.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1620 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz versus 1695 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt versus 350 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 versus 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 versus 3354

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

26747

15966

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1050

736

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

191350

105171

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

732.196

226.447

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7585.258

4161.764

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

63.011

25.476

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

247.569

118.544

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2441.384

1106.12

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

19811

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

19811

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

19948

10685

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	26747	15966
PassMark - G2D Mark	1050	736
Geekbench - OpenCL	191350	105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	732.196	226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258	4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.011	25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.569	118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384	1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398	19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398	19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19948	10685

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Nom de code	GA102	TU104
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020	13 August 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$1499	$2,299
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	45	161
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1695 MHz	1815 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1395 MHz	1620 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	10496
Pixel fill rate	189.8 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	350 Watt	200 Watt
Compte de transistor	28300 million	13,600 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Hauteur	138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	313 mm (12.3 inches)	267 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	750 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Largeur	Triple-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	24 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	936.2 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6X