NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 18797
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 798
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 74179
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 488.989
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5451.006
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 41.461
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 153.677
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1534.582
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 19571
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 19571
• Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 13943

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26747 18797
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1050 798
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191350 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7585.258 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.011 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	19948 13943

Compare specifications (specs)