NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

versus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 versus 18797
Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 versus 798
2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 versus 74179
Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 versus 488.989
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 5451.006
Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 versus 41.461
Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 versus 153.677
Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1534.582
Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 19571
Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 19571
Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 versus 13943

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020 versus 13 August 2018
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 12 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	26747 versus 18797
PassMark - G2D Mark	1050 versus 798
Geekbench - OpenCL	191350 versus 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	732.196 versus 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258 versus 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.011 versus 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.569 versus 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384 versus 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 versus 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 versus 19571
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19948 versus 13943

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz
Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
11.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1440 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt versus 350 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	14000 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 versus 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 versus 3354

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

26747

18797

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1050

798

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

191350

74179

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

732.196

488.989

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7585.258

5451.006

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

63.011

41.461

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

247.569

153.677

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2441.384

1534.582

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33398

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

19948

13943

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	26747	18797
PassMark - G2D Mark	1050	798
Geekbench - OpenCL	191350	74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	732.196	488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258	5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	63.011	41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	247.569	153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384	1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	19948	13943

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Nom de code	GA102	TU102
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020	13 August 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$1499	$6,299
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	45	120
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1695 MHz	1770 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1395 MHz	1440 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	10496
Pixel fill rate	189.8 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	350 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	28300 million	18,600 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Hauteur	138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	313 mm (12.3 inches)	267 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	750 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	2x 8-pin
Largeur	Triple-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	24 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	936.2 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6X