NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1312 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 1268.2x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 16235
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 406
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 176660
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 500.053
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 7209.392
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 41.826
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 73.167
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1253.829
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 16337
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 16337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1312 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 5120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 176660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 16337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 176660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 130 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |