NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 5120
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 versus 16235
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 406
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 versus 176660
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 500.053
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 7209.392
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 versus 41.826
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 versus 73.167
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1253.829
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 16337
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 16337
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 21 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 438.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 5120 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 versus 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 versus 176660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 versus 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 versus 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 versus 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 versus 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 versus 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 16337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 | 176660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Nom de code | GA102 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 46 | 130 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | Triple-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | HBM2 |