NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 564
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11911 vs 7881
• Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60604 vs 39165
• 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1329 vs 305
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 vs 134.765
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 vs 1316.075
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 vs 8.799
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 vs 573.418

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 81.395

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	970 564
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11911 7881
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	60604 39165
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1329 305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	210.151 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2513.128 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.875 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.395 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	806.848 573.418

Compare specifications (specs)