NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 2912.4x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 521
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11911 vs 3901
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60604 vs 11526
- 11.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1329 vs 117
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 vs 42.463
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 vs 642.715
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 vs 2.933
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.395 vs 26.532
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 vs 133.458
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 vs 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 vs 11526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 vs 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 vs 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 vs 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 vs 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 vs 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 vs 133.458 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 | 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 | 11526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 | 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Code name | GA106 | GM107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 205 | 707 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |