NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 62% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1755 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 126.4 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 350x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 versus 521
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11911 versus 3901
- 5.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 60604 versus 11526
- 11.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1329 versus 117
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 versus 42.463
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 versus 642.715
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 versus 2.933
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.395 versus 26.532
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 versus 133.458
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 versus 521 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 versus 3901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 versus 11526 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 versus 117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 versus 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 versus 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 versus 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 versus 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 versus 133.458 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 130 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 521 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 | 3901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 | 11526 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 | 117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 205 | 707 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.0 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
