NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 863 MHz
• Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 787.5x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 590
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11911 vs 7986
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60604 vs 23233
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 vs 57.735
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 vs 1269.688
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 vs 5.505
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.395 vs 37.407
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 vs 174.323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2777 vs 1329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	970 590
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11911 7986
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	60604 23233
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1329 2777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	210.151 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2513.128 1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.875 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.395 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	806.848 174.323

Compare specifications (specs)