NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 7424 vs 5120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 2023 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 5120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 931
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 24971
- 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 4179
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 159976
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 931 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 24971 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 vs 4179 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 159976 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 931 | 1052 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24971 | 26746 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 | 21090 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 159976 | 166557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 2023 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 62 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7424 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |