NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 2100M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 140 vs 103
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 143
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1249 vs 658
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1249 vs 658
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 20 January 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 vs 103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1249 vs 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1249 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 535 MHz
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.28 GTexel / s
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 2x 22.4 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 535 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.28 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2x 22.4 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 | 103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1249 | 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1249 | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G98 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1451 | 1453 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 535 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.28 GTexel / s | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |