NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 174
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 41
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2013 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 vs 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 41 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1687 vs 1382
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1687 vs 1382
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 vs 1382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 vs 1382 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 | 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 41 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 942 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1382 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 942 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1382 | 1687 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G96C |
Launch date | 10 March 2013 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1577 | 1585 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $59.46 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |