NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs Intel HD Graphics 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and Intel HD Graphics 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 155.52 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 298 vs 261
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 78 vs 35
- 17.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 101
- 17.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 298 vs 261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 vs 101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 810 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1137 vs 688
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1137 vs 688
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1137 vs 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1137 vs 688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 298 | 261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 103.797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 | 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 | 101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 | 1137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 | 101 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 4200M | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | GF119 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1645 | 1604 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | 20.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 1.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 995 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |