NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 192 vs 144
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 697 vs 654
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 111
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 1134
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 1134

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 388.8 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2859 vs 1709
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 vs 6.809
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 111.269
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 vs 0.399
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.581 vs 7.769
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.909 vs 9.522
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 976
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1720
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 976
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 654
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	288 111
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 7.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 252.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.769 12.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 21.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2827

Compare specifications (specs)