NVIDIA NVS 510 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 510
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 192 versus 144
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 696 versus 654
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 111
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 versus 1134
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 versus 1134
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 October 2012 versus 27 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 versus 144 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 696 versus 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 versus 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 versus 1134 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2860 versus 1709
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 versus 6.809
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 versus 111.269
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 versus 0.399
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.581 versus 7.769
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.909 versus 9.522
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 versus 976
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 versus 1720
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 versus 976
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 versus 1720
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 388.8 gflops versus 306.0 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2860 versus 1709 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 versus 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 versus 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 versus 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 versus 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 versus 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 versus 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 versus 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 versus 1720 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 696 | 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1709 | 2860 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | 252.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | 0.727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 | 2827 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK107 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 23 October 2012 | 27 October 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1430 | 1419 |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\DDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |