NVIDIA NVS 5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5100M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5100M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 58% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2747 vs 1857
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2747 vs 1857

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 208 vs 200
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	200 208
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 84
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2747 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2747 1857

Compare specifications (specs)