NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• 2x better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 286
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 77
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2130 vs 1313
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 3.237
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 83.376
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 vs 0.26
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 5.92
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 vs 4.992
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 2380
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 2380

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 vs 222
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1099
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 vs 222
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1099

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	507 286
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 77
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2130 1313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.829 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.966 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.539 0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.643 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.851 4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 2380

Compare specifications (specs)