NVIDIA NVS 5200M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 5200M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5200M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.75 GTexel / s versus 5.9 billion / sec
2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.0 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3140 MHz versus 800 MHz
Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 versus 286
2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 versus 77
Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2130 versus 1313
Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 versus 3.237
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 versus 83.376
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 versus 0.26
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 versus 5.92
3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 versus 4.992
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 versus 2380
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 versus 2380

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	17 September 2012 versus 5 January 2011
Taux de remplissage de la texture	10.75 GTexel / s versus 5.9 billion / sec
Pipelines	96 versus 48
Performance á point flottant	258.0 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	3140 MHz versus 800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	507 versus 286
PassMark - G2D Mark	188 versus 77
Geekbench - OpenCL	2130 versus 1313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.829 versus 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966 versus 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.539 versus 0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643 versus 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.851 versus 4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2715 versus 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2715 versus 2380

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 25 Watt
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 versus 222
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 1099
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 versus 222
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 1099

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt versus 25 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	536 versus 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1731 versus 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	536 versus 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1731 versus 1099

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

507

286

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

188

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2130

1313

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.829

3.237

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

189.966

83.376

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.539

0.26

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.643

5.92

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.851

4.992

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

222

536

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

1731

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2715

2380

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

222

536

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

1731

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2715

2380

Nom	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
PassMark - G3D Mark	507	286
PassMark - G2D Mark	188	77
Geekbench - OpenCL	2130	1313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.829	3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966	83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.539	0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643	5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.851	4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	222	536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1099	1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2715	2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	222	536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1099	1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2715	2380

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Nom de code	GF108	GF108
Date de sortie	17 September 2012	5 January 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1513	1558
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$59.99
Prix maintenant		$59.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		7.54
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	672 MHz	672 MHz
Performance á point flottant	258.0 gflops	129.02 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	96	48
Taux de remplissage de la texture	10.75 GTexel / s	5.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	12 Watt
Compte de transistor	585 million	585 million
Noyaux CUDA		48
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM	PCIe 2.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	25.12 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	3140 MHz	800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
DirectCompute
Optimus
Verde Drivers