NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 6.1x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
• 6.1x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 7x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 1051
• 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 vs 7525
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 20.161
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 304.279
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 1.655
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 30.046
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 96.934
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 2179
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 2179

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 251
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1680
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 1051
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 283
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 7525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3356

Compare specifications (specs)