NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• 4x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
• 1601.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 1749
• 8.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 vs 4493
• 13x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 12.582
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 364.463
• 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 1.254
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 18.386
• 19.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 23.499
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 2663
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 2663
• Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 vs 545

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 251
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1860
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1680
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1860
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 545

Compare specifications (specs)