NVIDIA P106-100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA P106-100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- 5.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- 1601.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 versus 1749
- 8.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 versus 4493
- 13x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 versus 12.582
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 versus 364.463
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 versus 1.254
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 versus 18.386
- 19.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 versus 23.499
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 versus 2663
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 versus 2663
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 versus 545
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 June 2017 versus 27 November 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 versus 1749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 versus 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 versus 2663 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 versus 545 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 251
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1860
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 1680
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1860
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 1680
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 1680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 251 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36174 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 899 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA P106-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | GP106 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 19 June 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 439 | 1003 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 250 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |