NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 147.62
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 11409
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 11409

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 6724
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 251
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37924 vs 36174
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1705.321
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 9.266
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 76.32
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 523.29 vs 448.036
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1680
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1860
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 9097
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 37924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3341

Compare specifications (specs)