NVIDIA Quadro 2000D versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 71% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 62 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 309
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 320.57 versus 302.509
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.168 versus 27.656
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 versus 3365
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3325
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 versus 3365
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 October 2011 versus 13 September 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt versus 106 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 309 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 versus 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 versus 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 versus 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 versus 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 625 MHz
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.1 billion / sec versus 20 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 601.3 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1318 versus 976
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 versus 3926
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 versus 11.122
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 versus 12.67
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1453
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1453
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 625 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.1 billion / sec versus 20 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1318 versus 976 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 versus 3926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 versus 11.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 versus 12.67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1453 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | 1318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3926 | 4936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF106 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 5 October 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $129 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1133 | 1135 |
| Prix maintenant | $209 | $64.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.27 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 625 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 178 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 41.6 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro 2000D avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
