NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 305M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and NVIDIA GeForce 305M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 4.2x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
  • 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
  • 11.5x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 36.8 gflops
  • 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 766 vs 151
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 vs 149
  • Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3424 vs 1987
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 January 2011 vs 10 January 2010
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 16
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops vs 36.8 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 766 vs 151
PassMark - G2D Mark 231 vs 149
Geekbench - OpenCL 3424 vs 1987

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 305M

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 55 Watt
Core clock speed 1150 MHz vs 550 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt vs 55 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 305M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
766
151
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
231
149
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3424
1987
Name NVIDIA Quadro 2000M NVIDIA GeForce 305M
PassMark - G3D Mark 766 151
PassMark - G2D Mark 231 149
Geekbench - OpenCL 3424 1987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2569

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M NVIDIA GeForce 305M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla 2.0
Code name GF106 GT218
Launch date 13 January 2011 10 January 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $46.56
Place in performance rating 1355 1356
Price now $46.56
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 25.92

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 1150 MHz
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops 36.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 16
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s 4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 1,170 million 260 million
CUDA cores 16
Gigaflops 55

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI-E 2.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0