NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 84 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 766 vs 388
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 vs 165
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2569 vs 1015
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2569 vs 1015

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 550 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	766 388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	231 165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2569 1015
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2569 1015

Compare specifications (specs)