NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and NVIDIA Tesla C1060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
3.4x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 188 Watt
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Launch date	13 January 2011 vs 9 April 2009
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 188 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Around 11% higher core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 550 MHz
2.8x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 240 vs 192
Around 47% better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18689 vs 3424

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	610 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	48.8 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	240 vs 192
Floating-point performance	622.1 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18689 vs 3424

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3424

18689

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M	NVIDIA Tesla C1060
PassMark - G3D Mark	766
PassMark - G2D Mark	231
Geekbench - OpenCL	3424	18689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2569

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M	NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF106	GT200B
Launch date	13 January 2011	9 April 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$46.56
Place in performance rating	1355	1131
Price now	$46.56
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	25.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	550 MHz	610 MHz
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	192	240
Texture fill rate	17.6 GTexel / s	48.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	188 Watt
Transistor count	1,170 million	1,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0