NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 5.6x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• 30x more pipelines: 240 vs 8
• 33.8x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 9.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 105
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 124

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 105
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 124
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543 542
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543 542

Compare specifications (specs)